| Milestone
1 (Kick Off + 6 months) – Requirements & Methodology
The first six months of the project is devoted to:
- Analyzing the requirements of the Water Framework Directive
and related GMES Projects
- Establishing the exact scope of the applications to be
covered (i.e. defining Use Cases) and defining the related
testing to be carried out
The main deliverables
are:
- The Data Harmonisation Requirements Report
- Methodology & Standards Guidelines on Use Case and
Schema Development
These deliverables will be important inputs into the parallel
MOTIIVE Project.
Milestone
2 (KO+12 months) – Implementation Specifications
The second six months of the project takes the Use Cases and
Guidelines Document generated previously and develops first
the conceptual and then the actual application schema required
by the project. The definition of the process is one of the
major outputs of this activity. Deliverables include:
- Use Case Descriptions together with guidelines as to
how to generate them
- Services Architecture Outline
- Conceptual Schema in UML
- Draft Product Specifications
- Draft Application Schema in UML
These outputs of this phase form the main core of the project
Milestone
3 (KO+18 months) – Implementation & Testing
The next 6 months of the project implements a test environment
which both tests the validity of the previous work and allows
users to see practical demonstrations of application schema
in operation. This will allow users to more easily see the
benefits of the data harmonisation process.
This period of the project will also see the issues of cost-benefit
analysis being addressed. A seminar and other dissemination
activities will also take place during this period to publicise
the results of the project.
Milestone
4 (project end) – Definition of the Repeatable Capabilities
& Dissemination
The last phase of the project will serve at consolidating
the lessons learnt during the project, both internally within
the consortium, and externally, by a major episode of the
interaction with the different segments of actors that can
contribute to a wide take-up of the results of the project.
This interaction will be in the two directions of having the
projects results reviewed and commented, and of disseminating
its concepts, raising awareness of the requirements for interoperability
and standards for the set up of a European Spatial Data Infrastructure,
and its many benefits to all concerned. This phase would also
comprise the set up of an OGC interoperability experiment
involving RISE and MOTIIVE.
Project
Structure
No
|
Workpackage
title |
Lead
|
1
|
Project
Management |
EuroGeographics
|
1.1
|
Contract
Management |
EuroGeographics
|
1.2
|
Project
Technical Management |
QinetiQ
|
2
|
Dissemination
& Exploitation |
EuroGeographics
|
2.1
|
Dissemination
|
EuroGeographics
|
2.2
|
Exploitation
Guidelines |
EuroGeographics
|
3
|
User
Requirements |
Lantmäteriet
|
3.1
|
Data
Harmonisation Requirements |
Lantmäteriet
|
3.2
|
Use
Cases Development |
OGC-Europe
|
3.3
|
Cost
Benefit Analysis |
OGC-Europe
|
4
|
Conceptual
Schema & Product Specifications |
BKG
|
4.1
|
Methodology
& Guidelines |
OGC-Europe
|
4.2
|
Viewpoint
Analysis & Architecture |
OGC-Europe
|
4.3
|
Conceptual
Schema & Product Specifications Development |
BKG
|
5
|
Proof
of concept |
QinetiQ
|
5.1
|
Application
Schema Development |
OGC-Europe
|
5.2
|
Test
Environment Implementation |
QinetiQ
|
5.3
|
Application
Schema Testing |
QinetiQ
|
5.4
|
Interoperability
Testing |
QinetiQ
|
|